Things are scary…
In recent weeks, an extremely busy semester ended, I cleaned and organized two offices, built a new computer (and rebuilt an old one), had family visiting for about a week, and… well, I have been trying to ignore much of what has been going on in the world. Things are just too scary.
With Greece, renewed talk of the PIIGS (or is it just PIGS without Italy?), the Louisiana oil spill, mounting strikes in many Western countires, North Korea attacking South Korea (?), things seem a little strange. But the coup de grâce had to be the official handing over of the last few keys to the world economy to the financial industry… here, I am talking about the trillion dollar bailouts announced in the Euro zone to try to stablize bloated, debt-ridden economies. Of course, everyone is in a tither because, yet again, politicians (and their constiuents) cannot face the realities of their false economies (and, despite what Stepehen “as an economist…” Harper says, I am including Canada’s debt/deficit reliant economy too). But few ever realize that when it comes to Western economies, it takes two to tango and the other recipients of these bailouts are the banking and financial industries who have created a global system whereby they can take excessive risks because profits are privatized and losses have been socialized (at least, well into the future). (By the way, I was reading a economic historian’s book on the weekend and it seems the idea that socialized risk dates back to the early twentieth century.)
The last few days, I have returned to reading about global economics and it tends to scare even me. James Howeard Kunstler is his old, < sarcasm > optimistic self < / sarcasm >. But one thing that really hit home was a graph from an article titled “The Financial Crisis is Far From Over” at ChrisMartenson.com:
It is not a new idea… just one that is conveniently glossed over by our “Is-the-recession-over-yet” media. Sovereign debt, that which is owed to financial institutions, bond-holders, and other governments that buy treasuries, is represented by the red bars. Unfunded liabilites, which more and more, includes pensions, health care benefits, and the general social safety net that politicians have promised to their constiuents is represented by the grey bar. So, it isn’t so much that we are broke (and we are) but that everything that people are counting on in the future is quite simply way beyond our abilities to pay for them. I’m sure that that will be the real issue that all of us have to comprehend.
Those people who think they live in a non-socialized state (like many of the anti-health-care tea-partiers in the U.S.), are in for a rude awakening when it dawns on them that the health care benefits they (will) receive in their senior years–and much of what we call ‘modern society’–is actually subsidized by the state. The fact that the U.S. has something like 58 trillion in unfunded liabilities (58 trillion!!) simply means that the future of those services is in doubt. In fact, this post indicates it is beginning to be a reality:
“Medicare Implodes – Doctors Opt out of Medicare at Alarming Rate,” Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis, http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2010/05/medicare-implodes-doctors-opt-out-of.html.
My prediction is this: we are going to have to come to terms with what this means for the future and there will be many hard decisions to make. When resources dwindle, will we be (can we be?) so accomodating of those with physical or mental disabilities? Senior care? Health care? I am surprised at how many friends, family, colleagues and even acquaintances have expressed their desire to not “be kept alive” if their health fails or if they experience serious bodily injury, so I think that many are (un)consciously thinking about the future in this way anyway. But, many refuse to do so and will continue to in the future. That, is where things might get really scary, and perhaps James Howard Kunstler is correct in thinking that people will elect maniacs to ensure that the expected standard of living does not fall.
.
Linux Mint (on my laptop) and Open Source Software
I very briefly mentioned in the last post that I was planning to install Linux Mint on my old desktop. I still intend to do
that (that is, once the rest of the parts arrive so I can build a new desktop) but I became impatient and decided to install it on my laptop Sunday afternoon. I needed to re-partition the hard drive anyway so I backed everything up and used an install CD that a friend gave to me.
If you don’t know about it, Linux Mint is an Open Source operating system that is community-made and free. Not only is it (the software) free but the source code is available to all (hence the ‘open source’). Linux Mint is based on another distribution of Linux known as Ubuntu (which itself is based on Debian, I think). Because it is open source, the code can be used and modified by anyone and redistributed (even commercially). The term ‘Linux’ is often used to refer to such operating systems but in a way, it really refers to the underlying kernel (a basic part of an operating system) that was famously written by Linus Torvalds. But all of that is representative of what Linux and open source software is all about: people from all over the world collaborating to build free software that anyone can use and contribute to (by volunteering or by donating money). Kind of a beautiful (and typically human) thing, really.
Linux as an OS (operating system) really took off for use as servers, especially because of the success of Apache (and open source web serer software package). But it has been gaining momentum as an OS for personal computers with the proliferation of people working on it (which explains all the different versions out there)… who are generally people that believe that software (and its underlying code) should not be proprietary and closed. Considering that a computer’s operating system is so crucial (for individuals, businesses and organizations), the question as to whether it should be solely in the control of a single corporation is exceedingly important. It might seem counter-intuitive but it has been shown that open
source software is often more secure and safe to use. With the code being ‘open’ and many different people knowing what is in it, then there is less of a possibility of it being used nefariously or secretly (i.e. the software secretly collecting information without the knowledge of the user). Also, because it is community driven, there is less of a chance (none really) that other software or services or media will be excluded.
That is why I love the idea of open source software.
So, what about Linux Mint? It seems very fast and I have only run into one problem, the driver for my wireless connection. I am not worried about it because the version I installed was a slightly older one and this seems to have been fixed in the latest version of both Ubuntu and Mint. Otherwise, it is a little more user-friendly (than the older version of Ubuntu I had on there) and is really well-designed. Mint seems, in my humble opinion, to be one step closer to creating an OS that could be used by almost anyone. Right now, most people would probably find distributions like Ubuntu and Mint to be too intimidating but I could see that in a few years, versions of Linux aimed at casual or mainstream users will be a reality. So, people who might not want to fork over $150 to $400 for a version of Windows (depending if you by it pre-installed on a computer or in a box from the store) or who might not think that paying $2000 for a $700 computer is a good idea (I’m thinking of Macs) will soon have a very inexpensive alternative.
And I think that is a good thing.
At any rate, I will use Mint for a little while longer and then decide if I should upgrade to the latest version of it or Ubuntu for the long term.