Capitalist propaganda

Let’s Play ‘Capitalism’!! The Bizarre World of Western Financial Markets

For me, yesterday was a bizarre day.  On the one hand, a BBC interview with a European trader was making its way through the financial blogosphere where the trader basically said he believed a large, global meltdown in the stock markets would happen in the next twelve months and that politicians worldwide are helpless to really do anything as the financial industry (Goldman Sachs) basically rules the world.  On the other hand, rumours that the European zone might come up with some ungodly large amount (I heard 2.5 trillion, which is supposedly not enough) to basically insure that the global banking system will not go belly-up.

Of course, and showing their complete disconnection with reality, the stock markets shot up (hey, rumours of band-aid solutions are as good as anything to trade upon I guess).

And then, this morning, markets are already up as much as they were yesterday because the Greek P.M. went begging, telling potential investors (bail-outers) that they would be investing in the ‘new’ Greece.  Consequently, clueless media-talking-heads on the radio, TV, and online are confidently gushing and in Canada this is especially worrying since there are a lot of people that believe the country is fundamentally sound and well-run (even though we have a similar debt-to-GDP ratio as many other countries, governments cannot balance the books (even in Alberta), and most people are themselves over-leveraged).

All this tells me just how much we rely on wishful thinking and good news… and just how much economic activity is based on small amounts of poor quality information.  It also shows to me that we have no idea what ‘capitalism’ and ‘free-market economy’ even mean anymore.  Let’s survey the situation.  Western governments everywhere are living completely beyond their means and when you include future liabilities like health care and pensions, we are essentially bankrupt.  The financial/banking system, which is on the hook for billions because of bad loans to governments, has also created an unregulated, derivatives market that is basically one giant casino… except this one deals in the hundreds of trillions (with a ‘T’) of dollars.  If this system is not bailed-out by taxpayers world-wide, it will fall in on itself, taking with it the savings and investments and pensions of millions of people across the globe.  This system fits the definition of a Ponzi scheme to a ‘T’ (which is of course measured in trillions).

So, for the Western system to continue, we need to have further bailouts… that is, on top of the bailouts of three years ago.  And then you have to think of all of the quantitative easings (basically, injecting more monopoly-money into the financial system and stock markets).  And, of course, there are all of the government loan-guarantees that are given out regularly (this morning, the promised loan-guarantee for the asbestos industry in Canada is in the news).  Oh, and then there are the subsidies and tax-breaks for massive industries ranging from petroleum to agriculture to biotech.  And, then there are those industries–communications, aerospace, weapons, defense, etc.–that are dependent upon government spending for the majority of their annual sales.  When you add it all up, it seems we capitalists are indeed socialists… or corporate-socialists.  (Hmmm… isn’t that partly the definition of fascism?)

At any rate, that pretty much sums up the world economy.  I do see more capitalism and competitive markets around me but these are mostly restricted to local, small businesses and entrepreneurs.  Anything on a larger scale (where one can afford lobbyists) seems to feed almost entirely from the public trough of make-believe money and the future wealth of taxpayers.

Peace.
.

China… the Saviour of Declining Western Economies?

Sometimes I wonder just how we got to where we are.  It’s amazing to see how, as a species, we have evolved and not only do we number around 7 billion but we have developed our culture and technology beyond anything that resembles the vast majority of life on the planet.  But it is also amazing, given the buffoons and fraudsters who are more often than not in charge of everything, that the human world actually runs at all.  You just have to look around.  At the people running your government(s).  At the CEOs of the major corporations running the world.  At the utter stupidity and naiveté that we regularly indulge in.  Case in point… the fact that Japan is about to implode and Libya, explode… and when people bother to look up from their Facebook page they are faced with endless stories of ‘royal’ weddings and journalism that seems to only care about Twitter ‘twends’ and the latest tween whose music video has gone viral.  Another case in point?  China.

China? The saviour of the many, declining Western economies?  Yes, that China… the centrally-planned, command economy run by a bunch of corrupt party bureaucrats in what is  the world’s largest, totalitarian Communist country.  Why no one sees the irony, yet the absurdity, in such a state affairs is further proof–as if any more should be needed–that we are utterly dependent upon the illusionary facades and paper thin veneer that is modern society.  Well, there are some people out there… a few journalists, some financial types, a handful of politicians and academics… who in my estimation seem to be able to cut through it all and at least make a reasonable attempt to understand what is really going out there.  And many of them, despite what we regularly hear in mainstream discourse, think that China could very well be, and most likely is, a giant real estate bubble.  No one knows when this bubble will burst but it, like all the others, surely will and it will not be pretty.  It might even be that China’s bubble will dwarf the recent bubbles in the West which themselves have consumed trillions in bail outs, quantitative easings, injections in the economy or whatever euphemism we use to hide the fact that corrupt, Western, pseudo-market economies are really nothing more than giant Ponzi schemes.

I have heard rumblings about China’s building boom, which is led by corrupt party functionaries and built on the backs of (and over the houses of) China’s poor, and it seems largely fueled by the Communist Party’s desire to keep the country’s GDP numbers high.  Not unlike the West’s Ponzi schemers but one difference was that rumours indicated there were entire building projects, even an entire city, that were just sitting empty.  This might indicate that the economic “miracle” that is China might not really be true; that the “astonishing” rise of a Chinese middle class (read: ‘consumer’ class) was not as astonishing as we might hope.  Well, there is nothing like ‘seeing’ it and this SBS Dateline piece from Australia was a lucky find while eating lunch today.  It turns out that it is not just one empty GDP city… the contagion has spread.

(In good Facebook, narcissistic fashion… I was alone, at my desk, eating (as usual) curry sliced beef and veggies over rice… yum.)

Update on Middle East Protests and Role of Social Media

I came across a very interesting article hosted at GlobalResearch.ca (based off of research from The Economist) which really puts the protests in the Middle East into a proper perspective:

“The Numbers Behind the Middle Eastern and North African Revolts”
by Washington’s Blog
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=23312

In the article, the author makes the very convincing case (again, based off of some research from The Economist) that points to the role of high unemployment, the population that is under 25, corruption and lack of democracy, GDP per person, censorship, etc.  If I were to add anything to the analysis, I would add the relative decline in oil production and the rise in population over the years (pegged in some way to standard of living over say the past forty years).  But it is an eye-opening piece and is really a good corrective to the utter drivel that is bandied about in most of the Western press about how social media is the cause behind all the unrest.  As I mentioned in “Social Media and Mainstream Media: Engines of Distraction and Propaganda,” such an easy explanation fits nicely with the script most Westerners want to believe and is, most importantly, a narrative that is very easy to digest.  Just imagine, as people virtually stalk old high school flames or play Farmville on Facebook while tweeting that they just ate something yummy, they can rest assured knowing that their social media habit is contributing to the democratization of the rest of the world.

Such beliefs have taken on absurd proportions in some surprising places.  Take this piece from the (left-leaning) alternative site AlterNet… the ‘him’ in the quote is the young Google marketing executive whom I mentioned in my previous post:

In a CNN interview from Tahrir Square, Wolf Blitzer asks him, ‘First Tunisia, now Egypt… what’s next?’

‘Ask Facebook,’ Ghonim responds. ‘I want to meet Mark Zuckerberg one day and thank him, actually… this revolution started online.’ Take that, Malcolm Gladwell!

Yes, ‘take that Malcolm Gladwell!’  (Malcolm Gladwell, a well-respected writer for the New Yorker has argued, much to the chagrin of the Apple-Facebook-Twitter acolytes, that there is much more to a social/political revolution than the branded communications medium being used by some in the movement, see here.)  So, according to this AlterNet writer, I guess if we want to know which authoritarian regime is going to fall because of public protests, we are to ask Mark Zuckerberg or whomever it is that heads Twitter.  I have always respected AlterNet, especially their coverage of issues leading up to the Iraq War.  But, like most things, it can become too successful and I think has, in recent years, descended more into pop culture worship, especially the new world of heavily branded, mass-consumer technology.  The pithy “take that…” comment is perhaps symbolic of what plagues a lot of Western media (even the so-called ‘alternative’ press): a mass-consumer, branded technological determinism that has more to do with marketing than reality.

Woe is us….

Social Media and Mainstream Media: Engines of Distraction and Propaganda

It has been some time since I last posted and a lot has happened in that time.  My blog was hacked (which was my fault for not keeping up with updates to my blogging software… but my hosting service fixed it in no time).  I have been extremely busy with a new semester (three courses, one graduate student, research and teaching assistants to supervise).  I have been walking to and from work (which shaves between seventy to ninety minutes off my day depending upon the route I take).  Some of my time has been spent with helping to plan some computer building workshops, along with the workings of other committees.  Increasingly, I have been recording and editng a lot of gameplay footage for both research and teaching purposes.  I started a very interesting book on early computers developed for the U.S. military (From Whirlwind to MITRE: The R&D Story of the SAGE Air Defense Computer; basically a MIT history of its involvement in the early computing industry and the military-industrial complex). And, finally, I have been trying to keep up with financial news the goings-on in places like England and Egypt.

There was a purpose for the listing of such personal details.  And that relates to the last subject listed: Egypt.

Earlier in the evening, I caught a part of 60 Minutes on CBS which focused on the popular uprising in Egypt and the role played by a thirty year-old marketing executive at Google in Egypt and Facebook/Twitter in instigating the events of the past two weeks.  It’s not that I doubt what was presented (at this point I can’t really comment upon the details of the story) since it all could very well turn out to be true… or close to the truth.  What I am interested in is the larger picture and the likely function of the 60 Minutes piece.  But first, a little back story is needed.

Egypt is in all likelihood caught up in an ongoing series of activities in international geo-politics that has also destabilized other countries in recent years.  The Ukraine and Georgia, Iran… all have seen major popular uprisings.  These ‘colour revolutions,’ as they have come to be known, are recognized for the important roles that various U.S. government/military agencies have played, particularly in helping setting things in motion.  This is nothing new really.  The U.S. and the U.K. orchestrated a coup in 1953 where the head of Iran was deposed and replaced by a Western puppet. The puppet was the infamous ‘Shah’ that ran a corrupt and authoritarian regime, but one friendly to Western interests (the deposed leader was a nationalist that got tired of British oil companies pumping the oil out of his country and nationalized the oil industry).  Anyway, we all know how the Shah’s regime ended: the Islamic revolution in 1979 that brought a very hostile, religious regime to power which was violently anti-western.

But this brings us back to Egypt… and 60 Minutes and social media.  By some accounts, the events in Egypt should not be so surprising.  The U.S. state department, social and youth groups from Egypt, communications companies and non-governmental agencies have been meeting in the past, including in public conferences, to aid in the various political activities.  Not surprisingly, all this has led to speculation as to what has been going on in places like Tunisia, Syria, Egypt, etc. Is this another colour revolution where U.S. intelligence tried to instigate popular uprisings?  The Ukraine and Georgia were obviously ways to pressure a resurgent Russia.  Even Iran is related historically to the U.S. and its struggle with Russia (or the Soviet Union).

That is why I found the 60 Minutes piece so intriguing.  It was basically a puff piece about this young man (a Google exec.) and the important and exclusive role that social media (other U.S. tech companies) played in the move toward democracy.  He was jailed by the regime for twelve days and released (with no apparent injuries) and then addressed large crowds on TV.  Importantly, he is not interested in leading politically.  It’s all a very neat and so perfect, you’d think it was a Hollywood script (which it may very well turn out to be).

As I said, many of the details are likely true.  But what is really important is that it just sounds right.  It fits the script of what we like to think in the West.  Our democratic institutions are strong, we are recovering from the financial crisis, our corporations and–most especially–our favourite pastimes (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter) have all helped to ouster a infamous dictator in the Middle East.  As I tell my students, for how fascinating (and fun) services like YouTube and Twitter are, they are at the same time a propagandist’s dream come true: propaganda that is sought out and passed on by domestic populations, particularly the young.  (And it doesn’t hurt that it can be done very cost-effectively, in 140 words or less.)

And here we arrive at the function of the 60 Minutes piece: propaganda for both domestic and international audiences where the ‘official’ story will quickly provide a dominant narrative that will cover the larger, more complex story.  Mainstream TV, in particular the “well-respected” 60 Minutes, broadcasts the compelling narrative described above.  A feel-good story about an articulate and Westernized Arab that will no doubt make the rounds of the game-changing social media networks.  Westerners will feel good that their way of life (especially their social media habit) is bringing democracy to the world.  More importantly, the more complex story about their government continually destabilizing parts of the world, not really for democracy but more for the competitive advantage of the U.S., will be relegated to the crevices of the internet and alternative press… where, of course, it can be easily dismissed as tin-foil-hat lore and the stuff of X-Files conspiracy.

It is the meeting of the new with the old.  The distraction provided by old media is updated with the relevancy of new media.  Older generations are united with the young in blissful ignorance and well-packaged versions of the truth.

For me, this is why propaganda is so fascinating.  As I said, it is not that it is untrue, it’s just a highly varnished and simplified version of the truth… and one that leaves out a great deal.  Since your average person is so busy and likely will not have time to really look into the details, the varnished truth will suffice.  ‘History’ has now been written with respect to the popular uprising in Egypt and this is the way it will be remembered for most people (and written into their little pieces of the social network).  It’s all about leveraging what is out there.

At any rate, it’s late and I have an early morning ahead of me.  I will try to update this post with links to the 60 Minutes piece and some good articles and images when I have a spare moment.

Peace.

.

Mainstream Media… AKA, the Elite Propaganda Machine

Today, my lunchtime reading included some articles about technical flaws with the new iPhone (and the apologist media like Engadget who dismiss them out of excessive fanboyism… and healthy product placement deals or outright payola) as well as some finaincial news.

I came across an article which confirms (as if it needed any more confirmation) that when it comes to mainstream media (free media, commercial media, or whatever you want to call it), their function is not to provide individuals with information but, instead, simply exist so that powerful interests in society can push propaganda and disinformation on the public.   Here is the article and the title pretty well sums it up:

Mike Shedlock, “Inane Thoughts of the Day: CNNMoney Article says ‘Housing Shortage is Coming’; Coldwell Banker CEO says Now is the ‘Absolute Best Time’ to Buy a Home,” June 25, 2010. http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2010/06/inane-thoughts-of-day-cnnmoney-article.html.

The author, Mike Shedlock (or ‘Mish’) does a very good job of picking apart such outright propaganda but I wonder just how many poor saps are sitting in front of CNN and hear this and think they are somehow getting the ‘inside dope.’  (For me, one of the truly confounding effects of mass media is that some people evidently think that the mass mediated messages they hear on, say, radio or television are in some way insider information.)

This process of mass communication is nothing new but surely does explain why we find ourselves in the global mess that we do financially.  For the past decade, the mainstream media have been letting loose a constant stream of financial koolaid, filling people’s minds with huge expectations and the belief that money somehow grows on trees (or on the magical equity in houses*).  And the questionable reliablility of the mainstream media is something that we should pay moer attention to.  If you look at your local news, it is probably filled with people who went to journalism school, are decent human beings, but are probably overworked and oiverly worried about the everyday worries that come with employment (career, office politics, etc.).  If they say something like “And this could just be another sign that the global recession is a thing of the past…,” what should we make of it?  More often than not, this is not a statement that comes from any empirical analysis or a wealth of knwoeldge or experience.  Instead, it is likely one part cliche (repeating what they hear around them, sometimes coming from the ‘experts’ they interview) and another part fear (they don’t want to rock the boat-full of advertisers and elites who depend upon the status quo).  Now, if you look at national news, things might be a little different but probably only in that the amount of influence that powerful interests and elites play is that much more prominent.  Most newscasters, especially on the mainstream news, are there because they are good looking and because they are willing to play within the rules of the system in order to achieve that position.  (Note that this does not mean they are lacking skills as journalists or newscasters.)  This explains why those people (and there were many) who warned of bubbles and fraud in the housing/mortgage/finance markets were mocked and belittled by the many journalists/pundits/experts who are attached to mainstream news.

Like so many things in life, if it sounds to good to be true, it probably isn’t.  With the media, if it is free, there is a good chance that it is simply to good to be true.

*This reminds me of a commercial from a few years back which depicts two small children, one of whom is on his hands and knees, with a flashlight or magnifying glass in his hands, inspecting the floor.  The other kid asks him what he is doing.  To which the first child replies: “Wooking for ekwidee… Dad says da howse is full of ekwidee and dat makes us vewee wich.”  I have to find that commerical as it pretty well sums up the naivety of the last decade (… or half century for that matter).

.